New Year's Eve,
Illuminati and lame excuses, what else?
Fellow ladies and gentleman,
intelligent monkeys and everyone else, who can possibly read this post. I
herewith announce that the year 2013 has officially ended today. Isn't it a
delight to see year per year passing by and being ready to be watched in retrospect
since there are so few incidents happening in a period of 364 days that we can
summarize them all in a three hour afternoon TV-show?!! And let's not forget all those people who become a better person now because why on earth try to change anything during the year if one can just procrastinate everything until New Year's Eve where he makes crackbrained resolutions, while being occupied with the attempt to substitute his whole bloodstream with alcohol! Ah, New Year's Day is such a marvelous event isn't it?
I could lead you now
through this glorious twelvemonth (an archaic and very significant term for
year indeed, isn't it) by talking about tedious (one of the new words I learned
for boring) happenings, showing you draggy (oh another synonym) pictures of them and
stating my humdrum (guess what that means) opinion on them, but instead I will
now have a cup of tea, lay my feet on my coffee table and watch an
episode of Game of Thrones - or ,well, let's make it a season, after all I´m on
vacation. ...
But, wait what? Holy shit, I have only
written like two posts in 2013? Geeze, what the hell happened to the dozens of
other posts I've written - or at least, thought about writing? Well, let us not
jump to conclusions, first of all always suspect the Illuminati or at least Scientology,
they must have got something to do with this terrible occurrence, don’t they? Or
no, much better the NSA, yeah the NSA is guilty that sounds always fine
nowadays. I got it; they didn't like my dissident and seditious blog posts
(remember Arnie and his incapability – they fear us Austrians, that is exactly
why they don’t let him become president, but I didn’t say that) and therefore
they decided to delete 70% of my blog (ask Edward Snowden), this sounds like a
legitimate excuse, am I right?
BUT to give this whole
beating around the bush some sense, I decided to drift away from my politically
motivated pamphlets and direct my attention towards some much more, let’s
say, exclusive topics in 2014. Some may regard it as complete rubbish and balderdash
and some may regard it as even more absurd, but I nevertheless intend to
attract but the core of my loyal community (which one day, hopefully, I’m going
to have).
A little Story about why Arnold
Schwarzenegger could never be the President of the United States of America!
Wait what? Why
the hell could Ronald Reagan become president and Arnie can not? He even became
governor of California so why not president as well? How shall we cope with
this impertinence and obvious racism? 1st
Option: Let's all make signs and rage in front of the American Embassy!!! 2nd Option:Let's read this blog post! Okay, now all
jokes aside. Last year, as you might have followed, Barack Hussein Obama was
reelected the president of the United States for another Administration
(that’s the official name for the four years lasting presidential term in the
US). Those elections -in my opinion- had such a remarkable presence in our
media oddly, did you notice that as well? However, what I
wondered about was, if the President of the USA gets elected the same way as we
elect our president (who is currently Heinz Fischer by the way). That is, in
fact, not the case, which results in me, having a topic to write about.
So, how gets the
US-President elected?
Well, first of
all, we need an appropriate candidate namely a natural born citizen of one of
the fifty states (Barack Obama was born in Hawaii; Arnold Schwarzenegger in
Thal bei Graz - not really in America, sorry Arnie), from the age of 35, who
has lived in the USA for at least the past 14 years.
To boot he must not
have been the president for the last two administrations, that’s why George
Bush for example wasn’t allowed to even line up in 2012 for the presidential
race. Furthermore, before we may talk about the official presidential elections, it is important to declare the opponents, which are always the two major
parties, the Republicans and the Democrats respectively the
presidential nominees of these parties and maybe some other candidates, who are
mostly nonames however, or rather their party is a noname in this competition
that means that they don’t get an even roughly important or slightly
significant amount of the votes compared with the other two. Thus back to the
Elephants (Republicans) and Donkeys (Democrats). Within these parties there are
usually again several contestants who compete against each other. Normally they
compete in the so-called primaries or caucuses, which are also
worth being explained but due to your concentration I will focus only on the
presidential election.
Anyway, the winner of this preliminary decision is then
usually chosen as the presidential nominee at the party´s convention. In 2012,
it was Mitt Romney for the Republicans, whereas the Democrats haven’t had any
other combatants within the party back then than Obama, so they have nominated
him the presidential nominee without any primary elections as they saw in him a
front-runner. On top of that he was the incumbent that means that he
already held the position and was therefore estimated a better-than-average
chance of being re-elected.
Now as we have
the opponents, let’s move on to the election itself. First of all, the
presidential elections aren´t direct elections like those of the US-Senate but
indirect elections that means that the president is in fact not elected
directly by the people but by an ElectoralCollege.
Donkeys (Democrats) vs. Elephants (Republicans)
So far so good,
but how does the Electoral College work?
Well, every state
has a number of electors equal to the total of its US senators (which is always
two) and its representatives, which are determined by the seize of the state´s
population . California, the most
populous state for example has 55 electoral votes (two senators and 53
representatives) while Rhode Island has only four. The District of Columbia by
the way has three. All in all there are 538 electors in the college, and those
are the ones, the Americans technically vote for, in order that they vote then
the president in turn. The electors themselves are chosen by the parties and of
course pledged to a certain candidate. Well, let’s say, actually they should
be, as in some states they aren’t bound to vote for the candidate they´ve been
elected for. So for example if an elector chosen by the Republican party and
the Republican voters decided to vote for Obama, that would have been called a
“faithless” elector, but this has happened only rarely throughout history. So
basically the electors cast a vote for the candidate they are pledged to.
Click on it to scale it up!
Now, in all
states except for Maine and Nebraska the college works on a winner-takes-it-all
(don’t mix it up with the song of ABBA) basis that means the winner of the
popular vote in one state gets all the Electoral College Votes even if the
margin of victory was only 49 to 51%. To become a president, the candidate
needs at least 270 College Votes and doesn’t have to win the national popular
vote which is one of the main criticisms and drawback of this system, because
in 2000 for example Al Gore won the national popular vote but George W. Bush
had more electoral votes and therefore became president.
Why do they use this system rather than the popular
vote?
The system itself
was chosen because it gives greater weight to the smaller states, one of the
checks and balances the US constitution values. For example the largest state,
California, has 12.03% of the US population but its 55 electors represent only
10.22% of the College total, while Wyoming, a sparsely populated state, has
only 0.18% of the population, but its three seats in the Electoral College give
it 0.56% of the college votes. If no candidate
gets a majority of Electoral College votes, then the House of Representatives
elects the president and the senate elects the vice-president. The elections
for the Electoral College are always on the first Tuesday after the first
Monday in November, then the chosen electors meet in the capitals of their
states and cast their vote, then the results are formally declared to the
senate on 6th January and the new president is finally inaugurated
on 20th January.
Here’s in the end a British
video for you if you are interested in a short summary of this post!